Ancient, medieval, Islamic and world history -- comments, resources and discussion.
Friday, July 19, 2013
Insight re Crusade and Jihad
There were plenty of religious rivalries before 1096, and a great many were Christian v Christian and Muslim v Muslim. Like Syria or Iraq today.
Labels:
Crusade and Jihad (HIST 3116),
Crusades,
jihad,
Middle Ages,
Middle East
Tuesday, July 16, 2013
Democracy in trouble
People in Egypt and elsewhere have expressed their concern
about recent events in that country as indicating a breakdown in a commitment
to democratic values and democratic institutions. The recent deposition of the democratically elected
but increasingly autocratic president has divided Egyptians and observers
alike. Was that deposition of Morsi necessary and justifiable or was it a
strategic mistake in the long run, since electoral politics has been trumped
once again by direct action, and the intervention of the Army? I think it is
safe to say that many people don’t know what to think, given the unattractive
alternatives.
It is easy enough to point out that Egyptians have not had
much experience in democratic debate and dealmaking, with the result that an
appeal to force or the threat of force comes too easily. However, a little bit
closer to home for those of us in North America we are also seeing the erosion of
democratic principles and practices.
First let us look at Canada. Our parliamentary institutions
are based on 19th century practices and beliefs. Many of them are
not really written down. Both parliamentarians and the general public have lost
track of customs that worked very well in the 19th century but are
not really understood today. Canadians strictly speaking do not elect a leader,
a president, a Prime Minister, but a government which can command the support
of the House of Commons. Ministers of the Crown hold that position as much
through a relationship with the Crown as they do as partners with the Prime
Minister. In principle they have a lot of independent authority. Thus the now
obsolescent practice of ministers who have blown it big time resigning their
position in Cabinet. They held the authority in the situation in question, and
because they did not fulfill their role adequately, they felt obliged to quit.
When was the last time this happened in Canada? Ministers no longer resign
because of scandals and no one can really make them do so except perhaps the
Prime Minister, because it’s an old custom that no longer is part of the
political culture of either parliamentarians or the population at large.
Indeed an even more important principle has been lost track
of in just the last few years. That is the idea that the Prime Minister and his
cabinet only hold office when they can command the confidence of the House of
Commons. Remember when Steven Harper was held in contempt of Parliament by
majority of the members? And the Governor General let him get away with
ignoring this and treating it as merely a partisan stunt? One can have a
certain amount of sympathy for the Governor General who probably felt that if
she fired Harper instead of letting him prorogue Parliament, she would enjoy no
support whatsoever in the political class. She was right, but right here the
Canadian Constitution broke down, and few people noticed or at least took it
seriously. Our elections seem to have been transformed into something like a plebiscite
on who makes the best Prime Minister. Canada has come to have something like a
presidential system but without much in the way of countervailing institutions
– with the important exception of the power of the provinces to resist the
feds.
So our 19th century institutions are in a shambles
because we don’t remember the 19th century principles that made them
effective, and we haven’t replaced them with more recent principles and
institutions. Close as we come is the tremendous power of the Prime Minister’s
Office (PMO) which I’m pretty sure is not constitutionally defined institution
at all.
If you look at the United States things are even worse. The
United States has at least two governments, the publicly recognized one and the
secret security apparatus. The security government does pretty much what it
wants, while the publicly recognize government flails around, and fails
spectacularly at dealing practically with real problems. See this recent article about the Republican tactic or attitude of devaluing legislation, at
least on the federal level where there are many important fights that they can’t
win. Compromise and dealmaking are out – just like in the 1850s! (Alarm should sound!)The dysfunction
is not on the constitutional level, rather in the bizarre rules of the House and
Senate that make sensible discussion almost impossible. These bizarre rules are
not anything new, but when the will to discuss issues evaporates – well, anyone
can see the result.
John Keane in his Life and Death of Democracy has pointed
out that what we think of as democratic institutions – elections and
parliaments – are really not sufficient to make democratic practice possible in
the modern world. This is even more true of democratic ideas. Too many people in
established democratic countries have no serious understanding of how the
system might and could and should work, and the price they pay is its
dysfunctional situation now.
Labels:
Canada,
USA,
world history of democracy
More of the story of the Good Duke
Okay, when it came to writing down the story of the Good Duke decades later, who exactly was it who remembered that he took 2000 head of poultry and 200 pieces of salt pork on his expedition to Africa? And who thought it was interesting to include this material and why?
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Michael the Syrian says
Concerning the War of the Birds.
In 1434 of the Syrian Era [A.D. 1123], a great war of the birds took place. Cranes and storks assembled for many days in the country from Amida to Tellakum (T'lxum/T'e"lxam). Then they began sending emissaries back and forth for three days. After a good deal of this traffic, they commenced fighting from the third hour [g411] until the ninth hour, shrieking loudly the while. There was a great slaughter on both sides. The storks were defeated and fled, and the war ended. Only God knows the reason for this.
More on this important chronicle and its new English translation soon.
In 1434 of the Syrian Era [A.D. 1123], a great war of the birds took place. Cranes and storks assembled for many days in the country from Amida to Tellakum (T'lxum/T'e"lxam). Then they began sending emissaries back and forth for three days. After a good deal of this traffic, they commenced fighting from the third hour [g411] until the ninth hour, shrieking loudly the while. There was a great slaughter on both sides. The storks were defeated and fled, and the war ended. Only God knows the reason for this.
More on this important chronicle and its new English translation soon.
Wit and wisdom from Deep Space 9
Quark, a merchant and a predatory capitalist criticizes the chivalry of his time:
Do you know what I like about Klingon stories?… Nothing! Lots of people die and nobody makes any profit!
Labels:
chivalry,
science fiction,
Star Trek,
television
Friday, July 12, 2013
It's not the Arab Spring, it's the French Revolution (1789-99)
From Foreign Policy:
This massive financial support follows on, and replaces, billions of dollars given by Qatar to the previous Muslim Brotherhood government. It is likely to prove equally ineffectual in delivering the desired payoffs, though. As Doha discovered to its dismay, money will buy only temporary love and symbolic returns. Whatever Gulf paymasters might hope, the new Egyptian government will be forced to respond to its own intensely turbulent, polarized, and dysfunctional domestic political arena. No outside player -- not Washington, Riyadh, Doha, or Tehran -- can really hope to effectively shape the new Egyptian politics for long.
Labels:
Arab Spring,
Egypt,
French Revolution,
revolution
Monday, July 08, 2013
Deadly economic myths
Over at Salon, Atkinson and Lind argue that simpleminded faith in economic myths is killing America.
I say, not just America.
I particularly liked this passage:
Myth 3: The economy is a market.
In the world of Econ 101, “the economy” is usually treated as a synonym for “the market.” But an enormous amount of economic activity takes place outside of competitive markets dominated by for-profit, private firms.
In the industrial nations of the OECD, government spending at all levels on average accounted for 46 percent before the Great Recession. Even in capitalist countries, the government is usually the largest employer, and the largest consumer of goods and services in areas like defense, education and infrastructure. Other non-market sectors responsible for goods and services production include the household (your chores are economic activity too, even if Econ 101 ignores them) and nonprofits like religious institutions, colleges and universities, charities and think tanks like ours. Markets, then, account for around half of a modern nation’s economic activity — maybe less, if uncounted household production is as big a part of the real economy as some have claimed.
Labels:
economics
Saturday, July 06, 2013
Funeral badge of the Black Prince, 1376
Labels:
14th century,
Black Prince,
Middle Ages
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)