This may strike some readers as too charitable, but I think it captures one dimension of the problem of the US media. If you really want to know what is going on in the world, you've got to sample other sources.
Aljazeera notes that some US media outlets did not bother to cover these attacks in Iraq, and wonders if the story will return. I think the answer depends on the journalistic integrity of the outlet. For many, the answer will be no. Many US media are nationalist media, and cover stories having to do with US national projects. Americans have already decided that Iraq was a mistake, and they know the US military is leaving, and so what happens there is not "news" as much of the corporate media defines it (i.e. a story that generates profits because of wide public interest in it).
Ancient, medieval, Islamic and world history -- comments, resources and discussion.
Pages
▼
Chivalric Questions
▼
Wednesday, December 09, 2009
Juan Cole explains the limitations of the US media
Discussing coverage of yesterday's coordinated bombings in Baghdad, he makes this worthwhile point:
No comments:
Post a Comment